Chengyue Wu

Assistant Professor


Curriculum vitae



Imaging Physics

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center



Evaluating the Use of rCBV as a Tumor Grade and Treatment Response Classifier Across NCI Quantitative Imaging Network Sites: Part II of the DSC-MRI Digital Reference Object (DRO) Challenge


Journal article


L. Bell, N. Semmineh, H. An, C. Eldeniz, R. Wahl, K. Schmainda, M. Prah, B. Erickson, P. Korfiatis, Chengyue Wu, A. Sorace, T. Yankeelov, N. Rutledge, T. Chenevert, D. Malyarenko, Yichu Liu, A. Brenner, Leland S. Hu, Yuxiang Zhou, J. Boxerman, Yi-Fen Yen, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Andrew L Beers, M. Muzi, A. Madhuranthakam, M. Pinho, Brian Johnson, C. Quarles
Tomography, 2020

Semantic Scholar DOI PubMedCentral PubMed
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Bell, L., Semmineh, N., An, H., Eldeniz, C., Wahl, R., Schmainda, K., … Quarles, C. (2020). Evaluating the Use of rCBV as a Tumor Grade and Treatment Response Classifier Across NCI Quantitative Imaging Network Sites: Part II of the DSC-MRI Digital Reference Object (DRO) Challenge. Tomography.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Bell, L., N. Semmineh, H. An, C. Eldeniz, R. Wahl, K. Schmainda, M. Prah, et al. “Evaluating the Use of RCBV as a Tumor Grade and Treatment Response Classifier Across NCI Quantitative Imaging Network Sites: Part II of the DSC-MRI Digital Reference Object (DRO) Challenge.” Tomography (2020).


MLA   Click to copy
Bell, L., et al. “Evaluating the Use of RCBV as a Tumor Grade and Treatment Response Classifier Across NCI Quantitative Imaging Network Sites: Part II of the DSC-MRI Digital Reference Object (DRO) Challenge.” Tomography, 2020.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{l2020a,
  title = {Evaluating the Use of rCBV as a Tumor Grade and Treatment Response Classifier Across NCI Quantitative Imaging Network Sites: Part II of the DSC-MRI Digital Reference Object (DRO) Challenge},
  year = {2020},
  journal = {Tomography},
  author = {Bell, L. and Semmineh, N. and An, H. and Eldeniz, C. and Wahl, R. and Schmainda, K. and Prah, M. and Erickson, B. and Korfiatis, P. and Wu, Chengyue and Sorace, A. and Yankeelov, T. and Rutledge, N. and Chenevert, T. and Malyarenko, D. and Liu, Yichu and Brenner, A. and Hu, Leland S. and Zhou, Yuxiang and Boxerman, J. and Yen, Yi-Fen and Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree and Beers, Andrew L and Muzi, M. and Madhuranthakam, A. and Pinho, M. and Johnson, Brian and Quarles, C.}
}

Abstract

We have previously characterized the reproducibility of brain tumor relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) using a dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging digital reference object across 12 sites using a range of imaging protocols and software platforms. As expected, reproducibility was highest when imaging protocols and software were consistent, but decreased when they were variable. Our goal in this study was to determine the impact of rCBV reproducibility for tumor grade and treatment response classification. We found that varying imaging protocols and software platforms produced a range of optimal thresholds for both tumor grading and treatment response, but the performance of these thresholds was similar. These findings further underscore the importance of standardizing acquisition and analysis protocols across sites and software benchmarking.


Share



Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in